Text and Con Text

START 2239 YOUTUBE _7fF0XAGaU0 Published Mar 7, 2024

systemic sensibility – Ison

felt sense – Midgley & Lilley

richness of systemic coherence (first axis)

sensual and consensual coordination

bounding of potential response (second axis)

thinking developed through oral language

thinking based on text, symbols, abstractions, formalized procedures and models

precision and certainty

rules of logic

~

40:09 / 1:26:58

capacity for reliability and management

bounding of potential response --->

richness of systemic coherence --->

capacity for coordinations among multiple domains

I have formalized an aspect of systemic understanding

What have I obscured with these distinctions?

Am I caught in hubris?

Certainty (as lifebelt)

are we caught in hubris with our beliefs in formulating and using Systems Sciences?

… back to HOW do we do what we do!

See also WOW

~

to evoke the poesis of meaning

richly dynamic and fractally scintillating medium

a viable relationship

~

peripheral "vision"

ephemeral / systemic cognition

oral language – socially conserved

written language, formalizations – durable, conserved externally

~

43:15 / 1:26:58

con-text (with the text)

viable (as cursor or mouse pointer)

shifting Attention. See also Shifting Sands