**Faculty of care work** The *School of livelihood and contribution* needs a pattern that invokes large-scale giving on Robin’s ‘Church spire principle’ from DaO: >. . ambitious collective projects \[of crowdfunding] . . sub-divided into innumerable pockets of activity . . united by purpose . . \[O]rganising such common endeavours is a creative art in itself . . sub-divided by municipality, locality, workplace or school using common metrics and a central resource of advice and information.
However, rather than being a simple-minded, self-congratulatory celebration of presumed ‘shared’ or ‘social’ values, or ‘simple’ generosity, these need to be organised as events that construct an active, explicit *aesthetic commons*, of value(ing), opposition, and mutual recognition and communicating. They need to develop - as a dance of genre, skill, conceptualisation and story - the distinction between ‘values’ and gut-feel, feelgood, 'our tribe' bonding, on one hand, and (skilful, intentional practices of) value(ing) and affiliating, on the other. This distinction lies at the heart of the Faculty of care work.