Can we get strong guarantees from AI tools that are known to hallucinate? We discuss some strategies, and ways that Elm might be a great target for AI assistance.
https://cdn.simplecast.com/audio/6a206baa-9c8e-4c25-9037-2b674204ba84/episodes/d1c5f97c-9700-48b0-ab35-a039edbfd0d5/audio/16dc506d-5aa1-42c1-8838-9ffaa3e0e1e9/default_tc.mp3
elm radio – 080: Elm and AI page 
[00:02:06]
GitHub Copilot X github
YOUTUBE 4RfD5JiXt3A Introducing their vision for the future of AI-powered software development with GitHub Copilot
[00:06:57] […] is typed pure functional programming a good fit for these AI tools?
YOUTUBE CxVJDcNLbao Let Github Copilot write your Elm for you – Charles Assus
[00:07:10] Are humans going to be maintaining it or are machines going to completely just take over the code and humans don't need to be involved?
[00:07:33] […] see it more as a collaboration between humans and AI at the point where the humans are no longer needed. Then, yes, the whole pure typed functional programming thing doesn't matter so much because it's an implementation detail at that point.
~