The ideal-type Dialogical State is obviously not ideal for all phases of management and Decision-making. It applies to preparatory and post-implementation phases when action alternatives and alternative sources of information are evaluated.
To make a decision literally means to cut through, and once the decision has finally been made, its implementation requires that any rival perspective be put in parentheses.
Implementation has to be monological [⇐ Monological State]. But after implementation, a system again needs to carry out an evaluation of effects in terms of rival perspectives, and thereby becomes sensitive to possible boomerang effects and shifts in the internal and external environments.
The question of Steersmanship … (Time for Dialogue and Monological Implementation)
~
BRÅTEN, Stein, 1984. The Third Position—beyond Artificial and Autopoietic Reduction. Kybernetes. 1 January 1984. Vol. 13, no. 3, p. 157–163. doi 
, page , page