[...], the individual, before it can arrive at its own inner self, must recognize it in the other person, especially in the Stranger, as the cause of his different, disturbing Behaviour, a Fact that can be interpreted onto- or psychogenetically with Piaget and Mead as well as phylo- or sociogenetically with Elias and Sohn-Rethel.
~
Bammé, Homo occidentalis, p. 188.
Is there a basis for an intersubjectivity originally conditioned by Movement that is not mediated by thought and language, and by means of which ego and alter form a complementary Dyad in the immediate meaning, without one of the two losing its complementary autonomy?
> […], these characteristics break radically with the assumptions in Freudian and Piagetian traditions which implied a long developmental period of de-centration before sociality and intersubjectivity could emerge.